Acheter Assassin's Creed Valhalla: Dawn of Ragnarök PC CD KEYS pas cher à partir de €11.24 🎮 expansion

Assassin's Creed has always held a special place within my heart, catering to a unique desire for historical fiction / modern science fantasy.Assassin's Creed has always held a special place within my heart, catering to a unique desire for historical fiction / modern science fantasy. It's no secret that the franchise has been riddled with bugs, and despite this every game up until this point had been in my opinion still very enjoyable. The problem I have with Valhalla has nothing to do with the storyline. The game is beautiful. The viking twist, while not a unique concept in itself, is new to the AC series. I really appreciate the addition of an even harder difficulty as I play all RPGs (and I have quite a few under my belt) at the hardest available difficulty. Hot take: The Witcher 2 and AC: Odyssey were both significantly more difficult than Elden Ring in terms of boss fights.The issue I've come to discuss, and the reason for my low rating (the worst AC in my opinion as a result of this bug, and that includes Brotherhood) is the dodge simply not registering. It's not that my dodge stopped working altogether. That probably would have been preferable to my current dilemma. The problem is that the dodge doesn't work *some* of the time. In a boss fight, where every attack is fatal and spamming dodge is out the question due to limited stamina, for roughly 5% of my dodge inputs to simply not register is absolutely out of the question and undeniably game breaking. I'm within the window for the dodge. I literally just played through Elden Ring, finishing it in about 60 hours and doing most of the secret bosses as a reference. I know what I'm talking about when I say the dodge mechanic is actually just inconsistent in Valhalla. 5% might not seem like a lot, but in a boss fight where every attack one taps you and you have to dodge a few dozen times just to get through a potion of the fight, it becomes an RNG fest just to see if you'll make it to the end before the random interval no input received dodge gets you killed. I absolutely hate that this is a thing. The game has been out for some time now, and for this to not have been patched feels like a complete failure on the part of the developers. I refuse to lower the difficulty, so I'll likely spend countless hours trying to slog my way through each boss, dying hundreds of times to a broken mechanic. I like a challenge, so long as it is dependent on my own skill and even a little RNG at times. But this is just disappointing.TL;DR Valhalla is broken because the dodge only works *most* of the time. You'll often be left standing in place like you never pressed the dodge button. You will die a lot if you play on the hardest difficulty solely due to this bug. Valhalla is now my least favorite AC game to date.

It really is beyond me why ANYONE would pay $40 for an expansion to the bloated grindfest AC Valhalla. Especially considering the expansion isIt really is beyond me why ANYONE would pay $40 for an expansion to the bloated grindfest AC Valhalla. Especially considering the expansion is all about grinding too, to justify the asking price, and the fact that Witcher 3 gave you TWO GREAT EXPANSIONS! for the same price as this PoS. Ubisoft really only cares about milking their franchises as much as possible and as fast as possible.

Dawn of Ragnarok is the perfect expansion for what the latest trilogy in the Assassin's Creed franchise set out to tell. With a fun new world to explore, new skills and, most importantly, a very well written story that should please longtime fans of the series.

Totalement hors sujet, Quid des Assassins, des Templiers et des Précurseurs? Ce DLC ne vaut pas ses 40 Francs (Francs Suisse). Graphiquement,Totalement hors sujet, Quid des Assassins, des Templiers et des Précurseurs? Ce DLC ne vaut pas ses 40 Francs (Francs Suisse). Graphiquement, Histoire, Gameplay, c'est ok, mais totalement à côté de la plaque et ne devrait pas avoir la nomenclature Assassin's Creed.Côté Technique, depuis que j'ai installé le DLC, le jeu ET la console Crash, m'obligeant à tirer la prise de la console (extinction sauvage) et ce n'est pas le seul problème, phrases parlées enchevêtrées, traductions Française aux fraises, on sent que ce "DLC" ou "Add-On" a été produit à la va-vite sans considération pour les fans de la franchise.Même en prix baissé, je n'oserais le conseiller à personne

With a gorgeous world and story to match, Assasins’s Creed: Dawn Of Ragnarok expands the scope of the original game in a direction that is quite fantastical and is bound to pull you in one last time.

WTF is this bull **** Ubisoft, can you please dont use The name of Assassins creed in games without Assassin's. Becouse this is not anWTF is this bull **** Ubisoft, can you please dont use The name of Assassins creed in games without Assassin's. Becouse this is not an Assassin's creed it is fcking myphology god of war ( so bad version of

Dawn of Ragnarok marks the end of Assassin's Creed for me. The graphics are still beautiful, and the combat is somewhat challenging, but the story itself and anything that was ever unique in the AC series is just gone. If you long to play as Odin again you might find some interest in it, but I doubt the almost-full-priced expansion you'd end up buying will make it feel worthy. Dawn of Ragnarok is the last straw for me - The assassins need either a brand new leader, possibly not even Ubisoft, or to be left alone.

Dawn Of Ragnarok is an extremely ambitious expansion that could be categorized as a stand-alone game. With a significant playtime that fluctuates between some very funny and somewhat tedious, the gameplay can be very unique and immersive.

If you love the mythological setting, sweet new armour sets and ability to turn into a bird, then Assassin’s Creed Valhalla: Dawn of Ragnarök may be one of the best expansions in the series.

While Assassin's Creed Valhalla: Dawn of Ragnarok has some brilliant ideas, it's far from the epic expansion that you'd want it to be. It's hampered by reused mechanics and a story that's woefully disconnected from your main character's arc.

The result is a rich and fun expansion, which will especially satisfy those who prefer the fantasy approach and the exquisitely action setting of the production.

AC Odyssey w all DLCs took 200 hours (100+100) to complete.AC Valhalla w all DLC have only 163 hours. 90+73 hours of 2 DLCs from the seasonAC Odyssey w all DLCs took 200 hours (100+100) to complete.AC Valhalla w all DLC have only 163 hours. 90+73 hours of 2 DLCs from the season pass, all sorts of free additional tasks and Dawn of Ragnarok.Ubisoft said it's "the most ambitious expansion in the history of the series". in my opinion, this is a blatant lie. In terms of scale, this addition was not even close to the Fate of Atlantis from Odyssey. Their attempt to sell this DLC not in a season pass, but separately, citing its scale, also does not stand up to criticism. In terms of scale, this expansion is the same as the previous Siege of Paris DLC. Nothing justifies releasing this expansion on its own rather than in the Season Pass. The plot is frankly weak, throughout the DLC there is only one strong cutscene, but it does not justify a separate sale. And the DLC itself is frankly weak, like Valhalla itself. 6/10.

Dawn of Ragnarök could have given us new items in shops, different resources to gather and craft with (though you can upgrade gear to a new tier, which is a nice addition) and more fun with its economy. And while there are differences to what we’ve already played through in the base game and its other two expansions, they don’t make the experience different enough. That said, however, the story here can’t be faulted, nor the treatment of the sagas and history of the Vikings and Norse myth, which is Dawn of Ragnarök’s best element.

Thanks to its new weapons, excellent characters and nuanced narrative, Dawn Of Ragnarök comes closer than ever before to breaking free of AC Valhalla’s template. Though it can’t entirely escape some over-familiar mission types, Dawn Of Ragnarök does a great job of pulling together several strands from the main game and prior expansions. Svartalfheim and Odin’s quest give AC Valhalla renewed energy and should please both fans and maybe entice some newcomers to dip into the franchise. Dawn Of Ragnarök is a substantial and overall impressive addition to the series.

The game deserves a minus rating! 99% Magic and Fantasy (There's barely any mythical accuracy!) 1% Assassin's Creed related content (This is just because the game brings the AC name on the box). Hack and Slash the same villains with different skins, raid and loot same all again and again. A great game of RPG fantasy wanderers who like exploring the map here and there without purpose. Why they even pay the narrative team there in Ubi? ''Where is Odin's Child?'' I am sure than anyone can write the story.

Another **** dlc from ubisoft. I don't know, how some people like this dlc, how they rate this s**t on 10/10. No lore, no logic. How they mayAnother **** dlc from ubisoft. I don't know, how some people like this dlc, how they rate this s**t on 10/10. No lore, no logic. How they may call it "Assasins Creed"? No words more.

The first post-season pass DLC is a substantial slab of new plot, gear, and abilities but never anything more than that. If you loved the base game, this is a lot more of exactly the same.

Solid DLC. Funny to watch some people here complain "huh i hate this game, so nobody can like it! Must be bots!" Lmao. Just cause you have badSolid DLC. Funny to watch some people here complain "huh i hate this game, so nobody can like it! Must be bots!" Lmao. Just cause you have bad taste in video games, is literally your personal problem and honestly i'm not surprised that Ubisoft fans are finally making new accounts here to protect their favorite games, because compared to Sony Movie games, Ubisoft fans have never cared for user scores on some sites, these games sell millions anyway, people are too busy playing these games than caring about some useless user scores on some websites. But it has been pretty obvious that in recent years some 40 y old virgins are endlessly trying to hate Ubisoft games (for whatever lame reasons they have), so i'm absolutely not surprised that Ubisoft fans are finally trying to say that "this is not okay basically, this mindless hating has literally gone too far", so they are clearly making new accounts, so they could express that they DO like this game. I know it might be shocking concept to some people, but gamers actually have different taste in gaming. I almost feel it's kind of cringe that i have to explain something so obvious, but why not i guess. Either way, solid DLC.

With Dawn of Ragnarok, Ubisoft has finished the Assassin's Creed Valhalla-arc, and it does so with style. Players can explore a huge new world and use new powers, which add a whole new layer to the gameplay. Besides the storyline there is plenty to do in Svartalfheim. The world does feel a bit repetitive at times and the price tag of the DLC is a bit high, but for fans of Valhalla, Dawn of Ragnarok is certainly worth it.

Great, fun expansion, just ignore low IQ negative "gamers" who just want to whine and complain until sun goes down. Just enjoy this great gameGreat, fun expansion, just ignore low IQ negative "gamers" who just want to whine and complain until sun goes down. Just enjoy this great game and that's it, there's no point to even read negative comments, because these people have literally zero idea what they are even talking about. Maybe they should find new hobby or whatever, gaming clearly isn't for them.

Fact that some people don't understand that this expansion is supposed to be disconnected from other AC games (Valhalla included) and just beFact that some people don't understand that this expansion is supposed to be disconnected from other AC games (Valhalla included) and just be fun mythological game, just shows how far humanity has fallen. These comments like "this is not Assassin's Creed blah blah blah" are top cringe at this point. Valhalla is 100% Assassin's Creed, Dawn of Ragnarok is fun expansion, just Far Cry Blood Dragon. Is it clear enough now???

Thank you Ubisoft for releasing another fun, entertaining video game, that doesn't have bosses that take 7 hours to beat. While otherThank you Ubisoft for releasing another fun, entertaining video game, that doesn't have bosses that take 7 hours to beat. While other companies release just boring, outdated games (Horizon, Dying Light 2, Elden Ring), i knew i could rely on Ubisoft releasing something that is actually fun to play. Some whiners say all the time "huh Ubisoft should learn from other companies" ummm no. It's the other way around. Other companies should learn from Ubisoft, how to make actually fun games.

Just more of the same, the amount of gameplay is hardly worth the extra money. Storyline is poor and extra gear is not adding to the combat much.

Lmao IGN review is hypocrisy at it's finest. They complain that while story is good, it still feels like Valhalla and they give it 6/10. ButLmao IGN review is hypocrisy at it's finest. They complain that while story is good, it still feels like Valhalla and they give it 6/10. But when Elden Ring feels like Dark Souls 3, then that's completely fine? lmao. Good game, just avoid negative reviews i guess, especially IGN apparently.

Only company that actually releases multiple games each year and each time certain type of "gamers" try to sht on them, while actuallyOnly company that actually releases multiple games each year and each time certain type of "gamers" try to sht on them, while actually everyone buys their games anyway. I bet Ubisoft haters are those same losers who think that Elden Ring is most innovative game of all time, 2013 graphics and 2016 combat, "innovative at it's finest". Ubisoft at least tries.

Great, fun game as expected, youtubers keep hating it, just like they did with Valhalla, but that's just how it is now. Every new Ubisoft gameGreat, fun game as expected, youtubers keep hating it, just like they did with Valhalla, but that's just how it is now. Every new Ubisoft game will be sht on by youtubers until 2030, because they just can't help themselves. They wont stop hating until Ubisoft goes back to AC 1 style, but thankfully that will never happen. If it was up to me, i think they should go back to something that would be combination of Black Flag story/combat and Unity parkour. But i take Valhalla and Dawn of Ragnarok any day over AC 1. You shouldn't care at all what some youtubers think, you should decide what you like. Valhalla was great and this is also solid, best out of all expansions imo. So my advice for AC fans would be - Ignore negative youtubers and enjoy great games, easy.

Good game, doesn't reinvent the wheel, but as game reviewers have already stated, innovation is completely overrated and even unnecessary asGood game, doesn't reinvent the wheel, but as game reviewers have already stated, innovation is completely overrated and even unnecessary as Elden Ring got 95 on Metacritic by using the same animations and graphics from Dark Souls 3. So it's only fair, that Ubisoft doesn't really need to make completely new mechanics either, as Valhalla already was solid game. So it's only fair that they can use some of that same stuff here as well, while also making fun new game.

Probably the most controversial and offensive material to hardcore Assassin's Creed fans in years.Leaving aside the fact that the expansionProbably the most controversial and offensive material to hardcore Assassin's Creed fans in years.Leaving aside the fact that the expansion massively ignores the franchise's "real" universe, you get a handful of extra hours of mythology, the same atmosphere felt in the base game by the worlds of Asgard & Jotunheim - but amplified (with new stealth/action skills, weapons and builds).It's dozens of additional hours of the same "beat 'em up" seen in Eivor Varinsdottir's earlier dreams, with a narrative that pretends to make an analogy to the Isu Era when in fact it is simply pleasing fans of high fantasy and God of War.Conclusion: If you're looking for content that massively expands the Assassins, Templars or Isu lore, DoR is not for you. However, if you just want to have fun in a whole new mythical map with stories that allude to the Norse sagas of Odin and his family, the DLC will provide you with an experience at least cool enough to spend a few hours of your days on it (That is, of course, if the occasional stuttering issues on the console don't bother you in the end).

If you sill want more Valhalla, Dawn of Ragnarok is perfect for you. It brings new fantasy world, new enemies, but mostly same gameplay.

The new ideas Dawn of Ragnarök plays around with are fun, but it can’t fully flourish under the weight of inconsistent writing and janky combat.

Dawn of Ragnarök outlines a new era for Valhalla. This DLC brings relevant and consistent novelties that really change the gameplay. Add to that an engaging epic narrative, a spellbinding new world, and a healthy dose of Norse mythology, and you have the best expansion Eivor has ever seen. Ubisoft had a nose in betting on the power of Odin and Nordic myths. However, we would have just liked a little more scope to enjoy a mythological epic worthy of Valhalla.

Dawn of Ragnarök outlines a new era for Valhalla. This DLC brings relevant and consistent novelties that really change the gameplay. Add to that an engaging epic narrative, a spellbinding new world, and a healthy dose of Norse mythology, and you have the best expansion Eivor has ever seen. Ubisoft had a nose in betting on the power of Odin and Nordic myths. However, we would have just liked a little more scope to enjoy a mythological epic worthy of Valhalla.

While it stumbles greatly in execution, Assassin’s Creed Valhalla - Dawn of Ragnarök reignites the magic of the main game with a vast realm to explore and myriad secrets to discover using the new Hugr powers. It’s still a ton of fun, just don’t expect the story to be all that coherent.

I have no doubt that Dawn of Ragnarok will be enjoyable for some. In truth, however, it only takes a hesitant half-step towards offering a full fantasy experience, and in not committing fully, it ends up being a shallow expansion that does little to justify its price point or its existence. I'm not sure who these Assassin's Creed fans are, the ones clamouring for a full-fledged fantasy RPG, with monsters and lighting boat cosmetics and new skins for their warbird, but clearly, Ubisoft is hoping to capture that market. If anything, Dawn of Ragnarok has made me realise that I'd much rather be fist-fighting the Pope, than taking down a fire demon with eyes made of lava.

Dawn of Ragnarok does enough to satisfy by the time that the credits roll, but if you're burnt out on Assassin's Creed Valhalla, there isn't much here that'll reignite your interest. The mythological angle is well played, the fantastical setting is cool, and Odin makes for an intriguing lead, but after a year of DLC and updates, Valhalla's gameplay loop is wearing a bit thin.

Assassin's Creed Valhalla: Dawn of Ragnarök easily eclipses both The Siege of Paris and Wrath of the Druids, serving up a good 40 hours-worth of top-notch action, exploration and challenges across a huge new world map. Combat here is enlivened by Eivor's new Hugr-Rip abilities, skills which also freshen up the game's puzzles and traversal, and the fantastical nature of the story leads to some of the biggest and best boss face-offs we've seen in the series to date. Newcomers may feel a little lost to begin with, there's a lot to get your head around here, but fans of Valhalla should be delighted with this deliciously fantastical new addition to the base game.

Eivor steps into the shoes of Odin for a grand stomp around a gorgeously realized fantasy realm in what has become my favorite Assassin's Creed experience of all time. Great writing, gorgeous visuals, and a ridiculous amount of content make this DLC worthy of being a stand alone game. Beyond being highly recommended, Dawn of Ragnarok is an absolutely necessity for Assassin's Creed fans.

Assassin's Creed Valhalla: Dawn of Ragnarök is an expansion that follows what the base game and the previous two expansions offered, with innovative mechanics and with a new setting, the story of Eivor/Odin keep going forward.

Dawn of Ragnarök is almost transformative for Assassin's Creed, teasing the possibility of what the series could become without the overt hand-holding that has defined it for almost two decades. However, after an intriguing opening, Dawn of Ragnarök falls back on old habits, and that feeling--coupled with how the expansion's narrative themes feel too similar to the base game--creates an experience that too often resembles something you've already had once before. But Dawn of Ragnarök is built on the bones of a great action-adventure RPG, and that carries much of the expansion, especially with the rewarding considerations introduced with the Hugr Rip. Only time will tell if Eivor and Havi's story continues beyond Dawn of Ragnarök, but if this is the end, it's a fine-enough conclusion to the relationship between the two.